IMO the raw Claude CLI is great for one-off interactive sessions, but as soon as you want repeatable multi-step workflows you’re either copy-pasting prompts forever or hacking your own solution manually. That’s exactly the gap these tools fill.
My take on a solution for this is https://ossature.dev — .smd spec markdown files + ossature audit / build that gives you DAG orchestration, SHA-traced increments, and tiny focused contexts.
I use bash scripts. Both Claude and Vibe support all kinds of arguments if you need a prompt to “become a task”. Bash is also deterministic and easy to read and debug.
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47262711 [1]: https://getcook.dev
My take on a solution for this is https://ossature.dev — .smd spec markdown files + ossature audit / build that gives you DAG orchestration, SHA-traced increments, and tiny focused contexts.
Was wondering if using front-matter instead of a "custom" encoding for parseble data was considered?
But in general this is meta to the CLI agent.
So if you were to use the CLI to perform a review of some code. This tool would allow you to loop the output of the code review 5 times onto itself.
Where are people finding time for these sort of projects.
My take? I like it. It's concise enough for me to try it out. And I love the webpage.
[1] https://github.com/rjcorwin/cook/blob/main/no-code/SKILL.md
* coolers whirring, gpus on fire, tokens flying, investors happy, developer goes for 6th break of the day