The most-disliked people in the publishing industry

(woman-of-letters.com)

46 points | by Caiero 3 days ago

7 comments

  • delichon 27 minutes ago
    I hope The Martian becomes the template of a new publishing world. Andy Weir couldn't get any publisher's attention until he self published and achieved 35,000 sales in three months without their help. He succeeded by word of mouth and not publisher's marketing.

    Almost all of the fiction I read comes by personal recommendations. Including from social media like Hacker News. I haven't stood in a bookstore browsing shelves and reading blurbs in many years but I read more than ever.

    A publisher provides marketing, editing and distribution. Literary marketing is becoming better in the peer-to-peer form than the old business-to-consumer form. Distribution has become unbundled via self-publishing. Editing is no less important than ever, but it would be so much better if the value from such an individual art can be captured by those talented individuals rather than by corporate.

    Long live literature, but may Big Publishing fade away into obsolescence.

  • legitster 1 hour ago
    This kind of reminds me of the book Get Shorty and the subsequent movie. About a mafia loan shark moving to hollywood and becoming a producer.

    Elmore Leonard was very familiar with movie producers by that point in his career, and clearly saw a a funny similarly between what a mob does and how Hollywood operates.

    At the same time, the book is almost a tender mark of appreciation towards the role a producer plays. It's one of the few stories that spotlights what a producer actually does and shows it's importance in greasing the wheels enough to actually make a movie.

  • paleotrope 1 hour ago
    That was worth the read. I did get a bit lost when the writer was talking about the different areas, prestige fiction, commercial fiction, nonprofit fiction.
  • tclancy 3 hours ago
    That was a fantastic read, thanks for the link!
  • christkv 3 hours ago
    Most books are loss leaders for publishing houses very few are profitable and even fewer are massively profitable. They keep publishing books that barely anybody reads because they have to have a diverse catalog.
    • BigTTYGothGF 1 hour ago
      > they have to have a diverse catalog.

      They have to have a diverse catalog because they don't know in advance which books will be the big sellers.

      • bombcar 1 hour ago
        Tolkien and Rowling probably combine to be the majority of British publishing revenues ...
    • didgetmaster 10 minutes ago
      It mirrors the venture capital business. Invest in 100 projects. Know that 90 of them will likely fail, 7 or 8 will break even, and just 2 or 3 will succeed. Hope that the successful ones are big enough to cover all the losses of the others plus some.
      • mistrial9 6 minutes ago
        no - capital intensive business has very different patterns than popular media business. The visibility of the VCs and the visibility of publishing houses has some small overlap. Day-to-day and implementation details, timelines for success.. audience, partners.. so many things are starkly different IMHO
    • bombcar 1 hour ago
      It's the shotgun approach. Lots and lots of attempts and ride the successes as far as they can.
  • bryanrasmussen 3 hours ago
    > I am giving a huge corporation a product to sell, but I am doing it for a fraction of what it cost me to produce that product.

    well, relatively huge by the article's own admission.

    on edit: changed but to by

  • The_Goonies1985 2 hours ago
    [dead]