9 comments

  • hybirdss 5 minutes ago
    What a fantastic idea. Developers who enable others to create art are artists in their own right!
  • allenu 2 hours ago
    I like the clean design of the landing page. I downloaded it and started the app and it needs an OBJ file to even do anything, so I wasn't able to play with it at all.

    It would be cool if it included sample OBJ files to entice me to find my own later. Otherwise I feel like I just hit a wall immediately in the app will probably not try it again.

    • 1-more 1 hour ago
      The way I tested was search Thingiverse for "angular" and download an STL, then convert it online to an OBJ on the first search result for "stl to obj"

      Specifically I tried this rook from this chess set. https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:5994219/files

      Sadly, some of the crenelations on top of it are just cubes with 2 sides missing that would be impossible to attach to the folded up rook. I imagine there is a ton of loss between a file for a 3D printer, a random convert to Obj with no settings, and this net maker, so I'm not unsympathetic to the problem. It's just that this is a printout that would not be foldable into something useful.

  • ge96 22 minutes ago
    I remember something like this was huge for rc planes 10-20 years ago as you could then make a plane out of thin bendable foam

    You'd make a 3D model from 3-views then use something like this to unfold it

    • shahar2k 9 minutes ago
      You're thinking of the same app i used to use! I think it was a Japanese app called Papakura? It's what helped me learn 3d modeling back in the day
  • dnpls 3 hours ago
    • detritus 1 hour ago
      So weird for me to see this popup now on HN as I happened to dig through an old downloads folder a few minutes ago and saw an install file for Pepakura (13/11/2014), and wondered where that sort of thing had ended up... .
    • aziaziazi 54 minutes ago
      But for Mac! I fonder the difference of the free and paid version through.
    • moralestapia 2 hours ago
      No!

      This one is called Unfolder, it's a different app, made by a different person, etc...

      More than one app per category can exist, and that's good!

  • KaiserPro 1 hour ago
    Oooo this might be useful for doing geometry unwrapping for laser cutting
  • matzie 23 minutes ago
    Unfolder? But I barely even know her! Jk, awesome project tho! Makes me wanna make cool packaging for products
  • Aurornis 1 hour ago
    This is really cool.

    As someone who is not into papercraft I'm intrigued, but it feels like it's not for me. If the app was advertised as having a small selection of simple models to get started with, people in my position might be more interested in trying it out.

  • constantlm 1 hour ago
    This is great - reminds me of the golden age of cool little MacOS apps
  • ElijahLynn 3 hours ago
    Mac only. Is there any reason this couldn't be a web app? And seems pretty restrictive to just have one platform, a desktop Mac.
    • dwb 2 hours ago
      If I built a Mac app, the reason would be that I use a Mac, as do a lot of other people, and native apps are a lot more pleasant than non-native apps. I don't really understand why it's "restrictive"? There is no restriction happening.
    • hbn 1 hour ago
      The author had to decide between making something excellent for some people or mediocre for everyone, and chose the former
    • aziaziazi 52 minutes ago
      You may use Pepakura if you’re running windows. Not sure if a web or linux alternative exist.
    • joemi 2 hours ago
      The same could be said about pretty much _any_ software.