18 comments

  • 0x1ch 14 minutes ago
    Why is eBay acting as the FCC? I can still buy lasers that will rip through your retina in the blink of a eye from eBay (lol). The equipment is completely legal to own and operate, and transmit with the proper licensing (which is not required to purchase said equipment).
  • eddythompson80 5 minutes ago
    I always found the difference between ham radio operators and computer hacker community interesting.

    There is obvious large overlap. Both are nerdy and techy and attract similar base groups. But the ham space is dominated by people who want to be "good citizens" through collective action, while computer hacker is more about cyberpunk "if I could do it, then it's allowed".

    Perhaps it's the clearest example of "The medium is the message" concept.

  • nubinetwork 42 minutes ago
    The purpose of the restriction is to keep people from using hacked baofengs to chat on bands a) they're not allowed to use unlicensed b) could potentially already be in use by another service eg EMS/fire/police.
    • sc68cal 26 minutes ago
      There are older UV-5R Baofengs that are in demand because they didn't have the software restriction that newer ones have. It's not that they're hacked, it's that they were not locked from the factory
      • Manuel_D 12 minutes ago
        Are newer baofengs locked down? I thought you can still just hold down 3 buttons while power cycling the radio to unlock TX from 400 to 520 MHz.

        Regardless, the Quansheng UV-K5 is largely supplanting the Baofeng as the go-to entry level HT, the 3rd party firmware for that radio is pretty impressive.

      • antonymoose 21 minutes ago
        I haven’t bought a UV-5R since 2024. That one is as unlockable with a trivial sequence of inputs.

        Are modern varieties truly locked or just “locked ;)” ?

    • devin 8 minutes ago
      I know nothing about this stuff. Is it only chatting on bands that is considered problematic? Are you allowed to listen on any frequency?
  • tfwnopmt 47 minutes ago
    For people that didn't read the article, listings will need to include the FCC ID. So most consumer goods will still be available.
  • zitterbewegung 27 minutes ago
    I can see that Meshtastic devices could also be blocked. Also, many don't operate with the FCC rules on the frequencies used.

    https://meshtastic.org/docs/legal/

    • twiclo 3 minutes ago
      Doesn't meshtastic operate in the unlicensed bands? Would that mean they're blocked? The article says they're only blocking devices that need FCC certification and since meshtastic is unlicensed it doesn't need FCC certification as far as I know.
    • hawaiijoe 23 minutes ago
      [flagged]
  • FabCH 6 minutes ago
    To be fair to eBay, their banned items policy is quite extensive.

    And also for some reason explicitly lists „military aircraft and ships“. Which surely should be allowed just for the comedic value.

  • subscribed 57 minutes ago
    Ouch,

    > new policy will not apply to gear that operates exclusively on amateur radio frequencies

    So almost everything is getting banned, at least the existing hardware.

    • scrumper 43 minutes ago
      If I read this right, it's only banning stuff without an FCC ID stamped on it. If you want to list, you have to provide the FCC ID.

      I believe the FCC ban doesn't apply to used gear but seems like eBay is taking a harder stance.

  • RobotToaster 23 minutes ago
    Who's going to be the first to vibe code an eBay alternative for radio gear?
    • usefulcat 17 minutes ago
      That's the trivially easy part. The hard part is convincing potential buyers and sellers that most participants are legit and not trying to scam people.
    • wewewedxfgdf 8 minutes ago
      Software is worth nothing anymore in many cases.
  • krunck 21 minutes ago
    It appears to be part of the "we can't trust anything from China" project. There do appear to be exceptions for low volume sellers.
  • iamnothere 29 minutes ago
    Does this now restrict ESP32s since some creative people have figured out how to use them as (limited) SDRs?

    Edit: as another commenter pointed out devices with an FCC ID will be fine (for now) which I assume covers these. And you can always DIY a frequency converter: https://hackaday.com/2026/10/15/so-you-want-to-make-your-sdr...

  • superkuh 16 minutes ago
    RIP all those human person made wideband low noise amplifier boards that cost $5. Now I'll have to buy a $50 minicircuits or whatever alternative with an FCC ID. Despite the fact that I'd only use the LNA for receive, it still could generate and amplifies RF not in the ham bands. So they'll certainly be banned. :\

    eBay simply does not have employees with the domain/technical knowledge to decide which things actually require an FCC ID to be displayed. As such they'll just ban anything and everything re: RF, like the example above.

    The one possible way out of this mess is that from the FCC https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-rules-strengthen-rul... text it seems like this only applies to incorporated entities with hundreds (for UAVs, etc) or thousands (everything else) of employees. There are probably vanishingly few corporations selling on ebay with more than 1k employees.

    • Uncle_Brumpus 11 minutes ago
      This sounds bad for me, a person who just purchased their first SDR yesterday. What unfortunate timing.
  • flourish_dev 29 minutes ago
    Amazon UK now requires ID for "bladed items".

    https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/amazon-uk-now-requires-p...

  • phyzome 53 minutes ago
    So that's... kind of all consumer electronics, at this point. (Because of Bluetooth and whatnot.)
    • zamadatix 34 minutes ago
      According to the title summary, but seemingly not the full details right?
  • seany 51 minutes ago
    How does this even work with test gear? There's a millions tools that would violate this
    • wmf 24 minutes ago
      It sounds like there's an exemption for used equipment which is what you would find on eBay.
    • smallmancontrov 22 minutes ago
      eBay makes waaaay too much skimming 10% off every test gear purchase to be closed minded about this, and in any case they have FCC IDs so they aren't under immediate threat.
  • InsidiousWombat 59 minutes ago
    I wonder how long the same gear will be sold with ham band only and a lil software patch to go back to normal.

    Also frankly the effort is kinda wasted, "breaching" on other bands was never hard and with availability of cheap SDRs, easier than ever.

    • driverdan 33 minutes ago
      That's already how it works today. A lot of Chinese radios can either be switched by a key press combo or flashed with alternative firmware.
    • techjamie 41 minutes ago
      It might not even be that much depending on what it is. For example, Baofeng radios would have TX in bands they shouldn't have until the FCC cracked down on them coming in.

      So they started selling them restricted to ham bands until the user pressed a key combo to factory reset them, which put them back to iirc 136-172.

  • behringer 22 minutes ago
    More regulation. If it's not regulation it's more taxation.
    • mixologic 17 minutes ago
      Ah, yes, that pesky FCC for regulating a public shared frequency spectrum. Im sure everybody will just behave in a vacuum of rules and wouldnt possibly do anything bad.
  • MoonWalk 45 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • hawaiijoe 23 minutes ago
    Nothing wrong with that.