19 comments

  • Shank 2 hours ago
    This is an area of planning known as "business continuity planning" and as part of this process, you should have a document and written procedures that are executed by humans, not computers, and tested as part of this. For example, your BCP should include people who are already trusted and know how your infrastructure works, and you should do a dress rehearsal on a yearly basis at least. A notification tool is one thing, but realistically this should be just one of your tools.
    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      Agreed.
      • romeo19361 1 hour ago
        The readme goes through rehearsals and contacts reconfirm yearly, and I confirm each still has what they need. Thanks, mate.
  • stevekemp 43 minutes ago
    I notice that your github README says that you don't accept pull-requests, that's fine, but you've still got them enabled upon the project. Perhaps you should go to your repository settings, and disable them?
    • romeo19361 35 minutes ago
      I'll check that out, thanks. I recall turning them off so will look into it :))
  • mrheosuper 2 hours ago
    Nice, i have similar idea for a while, with some additional features:

    - Easy to use, my idea is just have a telegram/facebook chatbot, people talk to it in plain English, what is their message, the receiver and the watch time.

    - Multi reminder: For example, you can set 3 days to send message 1, 10 days to send message 2 and so on. The idea is the message 1 can be "You are receiving this message because XXX has something to talk, please contact them if you can ASAP". So that if you forgot to "kick the dog" 1 day, your deep personal message won't be sent immediately.

  • jen729w 1 hour ago
    Hi Peter. This is advice I give to every AI product now, not just yours. Nothing personal.

    It's fine to use AI to create the product – but please, for the love of god, write your own copy. When someone can't be bothered writing their own landing page, I assume they're just not that bothered about the product.

    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      Fair call on the copy, I may tweak it. The product came from a brief I spent two days on, so the thinking is mine even where home page's words aren't entirely. This is a free product. I'm happy to have my Switch in place because my clients are loving the plans.
      • jen729w 43 minutes ago
        > the thinking is mine even where home page's words aren't entirely

        I know that, because I saw your HN post.

        A drive-by visitor doesn't. They see the AI copy, think 'slop', and keep going.

        • romeo19361 39 minutes ago
          The point has been noted, thanks Jen. :))
  • mortmeter 58 minutes ago
    Fun base rate: at 45 your odds of dying in a given week are about 1 in 16,000. So basically every missed check-in is going to be a holiday or a full inbox.
    • romeo19361 46 minutes ago
      Built in, you can pause it on your holiday for up to 28 days
  • y42 1 hour ago
    From my experience, there is no everlasting digital system, no matter how many fallbacks you add. So I wonder, how can you ensure, this still works after e. g. 1 year?
    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      The system checks with contacts after one year to reconfirm. If I don't receive my weekly check-in email I check the server. This is a best effort attempt to ensure business continuity for me if I'm dead. It's better than not having a plan for me. There's a health address you can point to that checks the system is working from an outside monitor. :)
  • N_Lens 2 hours ago
    Nice, although it seems likely that I would overlook replying to the email and everyone will panic when they get notified.
    • romeo19361 2 hours ago
      Also, if you miss the first email two more reminders are sent to you before emailing your next of kin. It's only when your next of kin says there's a problem, or doesn't answer, your lawyer and/or 2IC are informed. It's a great point you've raised.
    • romeo19361 2 hours ago
      It's designed to send one email to check on you per week. Currently for me this is 9am Monday. I can't miss it because I'm selling my clients the death plan in my contracts. You can change the timing of the email to suit your needs. Thanks for the great feedback :))
  • bmoathn 1 hour ago
    interesting concept. feels high gain at 1/wk. like, can it subscribe to my garmin connect or something?
    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      It's only one button to press each week. I don't have a Garmin, that would be interesting to connect it in that way for your use case.
  • iugtmkbdfil834 2 hours ago
    Love it. Will test. Initial feedback: consider configurable timetable threshold ( not everyone will want the same ).
    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      Would love the feedback and test, thankyou.
  • mococa 1 hour ago
    You’d use temporal workflows, this operation should never fail
  • AndrewKemendo 2 hours ago
    I would make it monthly or quarterly not weekly

    By the way Google has had this for a while and I signed up for it back in 2018 or so.

    they check in it feels like quarterly at most

    https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/3036546?hl=en

    • romeo19361 2 hours ago
      For version 1 we decided for the check-in to be weekly because it can still take 13 days for the Switch to tell the lawyer and/or the 2IC where our master keys are held. Thanks for the link, this isn't locked to google accounts, it's more so for the 2IC to ensure business continuity with servers domains Dropbox etc.
  • effortprogramme 1 hour ago
    Nice Work! I know you have a deep expertise in your domain, but I think you may wanna de-slop the website since it pretty looks like ai-generated.
  • aabhay 2 hours ago
    > I’ve been testing it for one week

    So, you haven’t had enough time to even encounter most edge cases :)

  • yieldcrv 1 hour ago
    > and it passed 42 unit tests

    wowww 42 unit tests that Claude made up

    I was into it until you considered this a level of assurance

    feels like you’ve been out of the software industry for a decade or two

    but maybe you know your clientele and they would find this validating. I’ve entered into a couple industries over time where complete non sequiturs are what sold products. “So-and-so has this random unrelated credential, and thats why he will be the trusted partner for this commodities shipment he has no experience in”

    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      Fair enough. The readme contains the rehearsal script so you can make sure it's working for you. We don't host this service so you are ensuring the product works for you via rehearsal and usage.
  • altmanaltman 1 hour ago
    > What if I go missing or die? The right people are told and my business can continue to operate for *my clients*... I was hospitalised in 2012 and lost my business back then and I couldn't get the data to my technical 2IC in time without frustrating *my clients*... *My clients* are telling me this is a strong sales feature when they trust me with their hosting and technology accounts.

    I am not sure why this focus on clients in a context like this feels unsettling to me, but it does.

    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      I'm building a business for the long term and those clients are investing money into me. My next of kin is notified first. It just seems sensible to give my clients long term security if I have another health issue or die.
    • bayarearefugee 1 hour ago
      I can see some decent reasons for a dead man's switch, like notifying people in the situation where you live alone and have pets (though you'd want it to be much shorter than a week) or to send a goodbye or legal documents to a loved one, but I'll be honest, I don't feel the least bit of obligation to anyone who is just a business contact after I'm dead. They can figure it out, or not. Not my fuckin' problem anymore.
      • dofm 53 minutes ago
        Over the years as a freelancer I have had clients who would be more devastated by my death than my own family, and it’s not like my family doesn’t love me.

        When you are a small business you often have small business clients, and it is fully possible for projects to be at a fairly delicate stage where it’s crucial for their business, they have part-paid, and the time and money in finding a replacement for your input would put them at some risk.

        I once had to try to help a company whose web developer had died of a heart attack just before rolling out a really major bit of code that had been months in the making. I couldn’t help much (couldn’t get access to things) but the company could not afford to redo the work.

        The people who urged me to try to help them were their most direct competitor! The world of some small businesses is that precarious and interconnected that their competitors were trying help them stay in business.

      • romeo19361 1 hour ago
        I like my clients :)) that's all I can say. Thanks for the comments.
  • matt3210 2 hours ago
    > Happy to answer any questions

    Are you OK bro?

    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      Yes — healthy and fine. I checked in with my Switch yesterday:))
  • georgestones 1 hour ago
    [dead]
  • vasco 2 hours ago
    Why do people share projects that can be made in 10 prompts?
    • jubilee33 1 hour ago
      I'm always too embarrassed to show the things I make on here. Some voice keeps telling me "they aren't really outstanding or novel qnd nobody will care"

      But seeing the front page the past few months, maybe i should. Or not, I honestly don't know how to feel. İ like people sharing and having the courage to put their work out, but if this place gets cluttered with "i installed Linux on my AI laptop" Where then to go to find any interesting info. There is arvix? No frivolous things there right? :p

      I liked the project by the way, even if it's a bit trivial.

      • romeo19361 1 hour ago
        <3
      • altmanaltman 1 hour ago
        most posts do not show up in the front page at all, the ones you're seeing are the ones that are actually good (in an ideal world, in reality a lot of this is controlled anyway). But yeah even if you make the best thing you've ever dreamed of, do not think posting it on HN = automatic front page. Most content never makes it and gets like 1-2 upvotes. I've hit #1 only once even though i post regularly. Just as long as you're not spamming or breaking any general rules it's alright to take a chance with anything you deem interesting or worth tinkering with.
    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      I shared it because my business had the need and to inspire others to think about succession. It's dead simple to build with or without AI for a seasoned coder:))
  • egamirorrim 1 hour ago
    People still write things in PHP?
    • dofm 1 hour ago
      All those various regular code popularity surveys place it above Rust and Go.

      It’s still the most easily-deployable language to build web apps in, and there’s nothing particularly missing from it now.

      Also AI writes it really well (is good at using the latest features etc.), it has a remarkably un-fucked-up package manager, Laravel is fairly easy to work with, etc.

    • romeo19361 1 hour ago
      PHP by Larry Ullman happened to be the first programming book I read in 2002. I love PHP and I can understand what Claude is doing with it.