Children of Men: The Future Is a Mirror for the Present

(reactormag.com)

48 points | by speckx 1 hour ago

11 comments

  • jacquesm 2 minutes ago
    One of the best movies I've ever watched, and one of the few that I could only watch once. It alternates between a gut-wrenching view of a very plausible future and scenes that have you sitting on the edge of your chair. To call it roller coaster would be an understatement.

    If you haven't watched it: don't read the rest of the comments here, go watch the movie, then read the comments.

  • julianpye 31 minutes ago
    I went to the Biennale in Venice last weekend and thought about the movie intensely after visiting the Japanese pavilion. If you don't know about it - the Biennale features artists representing specific countries as they transform a fixed pavilion building into their vision. When you walk across the Giardini site, you walk through themes of the globe. Often these themes are overly political and identity-themed, but the simplicity of the Japanese pavilion this year was refreshing.

    This year the Japanese pavilion was full of 11lb baby dolls, which a user could adopt and walk around with and interact with in changing stations and sleep and play areas. The intro said: "Babies are born anywhere, regardless of wars, terrors, and boycotts." It made me think how they used to be everywhere and now that birth rates have declined significantly they have become rare, expensive and often parents handle them like some luxurious pet, when they should be 'renewables' of ourselves.

    • yboris 7 minutes ago
      YouTube short of the space: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Gww1RtyEwww
    • lotsofpulp 1 minute ago
      Babies have always been expensive. The expense just happened to not be fully accounted for until recently.
    • khalic 29 minutes ago
      I keep marveling at art's capacity to elicit deep thoughts and feelings, universally
  • trevithick 22 minutes ago
    This is a great movie. There's more tension in the low-speed car chase scene than any high-speed chase I've ever watched.
  • flerchin 32 minutes ago
    It's a real gem. I've only seen it once, but I still reference this movie at least a couple of times a year. With world fertility rates seemingly all in decline, it only becomes more relevant.
    • swiftcoder 6 minutes ago
      > With world fertility rates seemingly all in decline

      As much as various folks like to bang on about declining birthrates, the global birthrate is positive (i.e. >2.0 children per woman), and birthrates are only really low in very affluent demographics.

      There's nothing particularly sinister going on either - since most children with access to adequate nutrition and healthcare now survive into adulthood, these societies are not losing a ton of population to wars, very little reason for reproducing above replacement rate.

      • cael450 0 minutes ago
        Yeah, it is very weird to me too. It's only a problem in a handful of countries that have really, really low birthrates and can't/won't attract immigrants.
  • arkensaw 18 minutes ago
    Tangent time:

    I love Children of Men, I think its dark, prescient, moving and a fantastic technical achievement. Easily one of my top five movies.

    I found myself nodding along with everything until I hit these lines:

    > Many excellent movies are chase movies! The Terminator (1984) is a chase movie. Alfred Hitchcock’s North by Northwest (1959) is a chase movie. One of the greatest movies ever made (according to me), George Miller’s Mad Max: Fury Road (2015), is the purest distillation of a chase movie.

    Why do people love Fury Road so much? I watched it in the cinema, and I enjoyed it. I thought it was very colorful, had great stunts, etc. A bit derivative of the second and third movie but whatever. George Miller has a format that seems to work. I was shocked when it was nominated for best picture. Best Picture! Years later I listened to a podcast on the making of it, and got a lot of insight into the struggle behind the scenes, and how difficult it was both on set and in pre-production. I had new found respect for everyone involved. I watched it again with new eyes, and... nope. It's fine. It's got some great set-pieces, but I just don't understand the hyperbole. It is, at best, the 3rd best Mad Max movie

    • righthand 4 minutes ago
      It was the first intro to Mad Max for a lot of people is why.
  • bluegatty 20 minutes ago
    It's a nativity story; faith overcoming nihilism. Explicitly in the book, obliquely (but frankly obviously) in the film.
  • thrownawaysz 22 minutes ago
    Interesting how the article is not mentioning the (inverted) Christian allegory as if that doesn't even exist. It's not even subtle if you actually watch the film, like that's almost the point of it.

    The original book is even more explicit about that, like Theo does a makeshipt baptism on the infant amidst all the fighting.

  • enaaem 10 minutes ago
    Sci-fi has always been the perfect vehicle for social commentary, because it does not instantly trigger anything inside people. It is an impossible story in an impossible world, so relax. If you want to write something about black and white people, you should write a story about purple and green people instead. That's how X-men escapes all the woke allegations.
  • debrisontrack 32 minutes ago
    I'm just at beginning of the article, but I immediately have to disagree with something :) "...this remains one of the absolute best sci fi movies of the 21st century."

    I'd say it's not just one of the best sci fi movies, it's one of the best movies of the 21st century, period. Definitely one of my all time favorites, despite some of its flaws, it wastes no time, has great pace, is a fully contained story and gets its point across very well. And I'm not even talking about how relevant some of its themes are.

    ...anyway, back to reading.

  • scotty79 38 minutes ago
    > One particularly brilliant aspect I keep thinking about is how the movie ends. We don’t know what will become of Kee and her baby. [...] We want to think Kee and her baby will change things, but we don’t know for sure because the future is—quite literally, in the final scene—shrouded in fog.

    When I first saw this movie, I think the last scene was just her with baby and dead protagonist in a boat, in the fog.

    But when I rewatched it more recently, there was also the ship they were trying to reach appearing out of the fog.

    Did this movie have two different ending versions? Or did I just misremeber or watched a damaged copy? What ending have you seen?

  • 48585858 41 minutes ago
    [flagged]